journal of dairy research

  • Home
    • About >
      • Log In assistance
      • Special Access pages
    • Contact JDR
    • Join JDR Community
  • Latest Research
    • Papers for Community Peer Review
    • First View Articles
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Next issue
    • Latest content infographic
    • Vol 85(1)
    • Vol 84(4)
    • JDR 84(3)
    • JDR 84(2)
    • JDR 84(1)
    • JDR 83(4)
    • JDR 83(3)
    • JDR 83(2)
    • JDR 83(1)
  • Submission and Review
    • Prepare your Manuscript
    • Submit your Manuscript >
      • Submit supplementary file
    • Peer Review Process
    • Join the JDR Peer Review Pool
    • JDR Editorial Office >
      • EBM Resource Page (restricted access)
  • Home
    • About >
      • Log In assistance
      • Special Access pages
    • Contact JDR
    • Join JDR Community
  • Latest Research
    • Papers for Community Peer Review
    • First View Articles
    • Reviews
    • Editorials
    • Next issue
    • Latest content infographic
    • Vol 85(1)
    • Vol 84(4)
    • JDR 84(3)
    • JDR 84(2)
    • JDR 84(1)
    • JDR 83(4)
    • JDR 83(3)
    • JDR 83(2)
    • JDR 83(1)
  • Submission and Review
    • Prepare your Manuscript
    • Submit your Manuscript >
      • Submit supplementary file
    • Peer Review Process
    • Join the JDR Peer Review Pool
    • JDR Editorial Office >
      • EBM Resource Page (restricted access)

JDR Peer Review:
Revised Manuscript

    JDR Peer Review


    Assessment 

    Guidance for Authors

    Thank you, the Peer Review is complete. Remember to press SUBMIT!
Submit
Thank you for Peer Reviewing this manuscript for JDR. A revised version of the manuscript has now been submitted. Could you please assess the revision and tell us if it is now acceptable for publication. Thank you!  

Please conduct the assessment as quickly as possible, preferably within two weeks of receipt

The assessment decision has three options: 
  • The authors have satisfied my concerns; the manuscript is now acceptable for publication 
  • The authors have partially satisfied my concerns, but further revision is necessary
  • The authors have failed to satisfy my concerns. the manuscript should be rejected
 
Guidance for Authors
If you have chosen to recommend further revision or rejection, you should use the Guidance for Authors to explain why you came to this decision. Please state your reasons clearly and succinctly.





 

















Please remember to press the submit button when you have finished your Assessment. You will then see a "Thank you" screen. If you do not see this, the submission has failed, probably because you have not filled in all of the compulsory fields. Find the error and correct it, then press submit again. ​Your report will be available online anonymously to the Authors, you and the EBM 

.  . 

       

Picture


JournalofDairyResearch.org is a  Breathe Science website

✕