journal of dairy research

  • Home
    • About >
      • Our JDR
      • Hannah Dairy Research Foundation
      • Log In assistance
      • Special Access pages
      • Data Privacy
    • Contact JDR
    • Join JDR Community
  • Latest Research
    • JDR Published Volumes >
      • JDR 90(1)
      • JDR 89(4)
      • JDR 89(3)
      • JDR 89(2)
      • JDR 89(1)
      • JDR 88(4)
      • JDR 88(3)
      • JDR 88(2)
      • JDR 88(1)
      • JDR 87(4)
      • JDR 87(3)
      • JDR 87(2)
      • JDR 87(1)
      • JDR 86(4)
      • JDR 86(3)
      • JDR 86(2)
      • JDR 86(1)
      • JDR 85(4)
      • JDR 85(3)
      • JDR 85(2)
      • Vol 85(1)
      • Vol 84(4)
      • JDR 84(3)
      • JDR 84(2)
      • JDR 84(1)
      • JDR 83(4)
      • JDR 83(3)
      • JDR 83(2)
      • JDR 83(1)
    • First View Articles
    • DairyCare Special Issue
    • Papers for Community Peer Review
    • Editorials
    • Reviews
    • Collected Abstracts
    • Foreign Language Abstracts
    • PhD Thesis Abstracts
    • Research clusters >
      • Wastewater cluster
      • Mastitis Cluster
    • Latest content infographic
    • Conferences and Workshops >
      • Next Generation Dairying >
        • Next Generation Dairying 2022 >
          • Workshop Expression of interest
          • Programme 2022
        • Next Generation Dairying 2021
        • Next Generation Dairying 2018 >
          • Workshop Proceedings
        • Next Generation Dairying 2019 >
          • Programme
          • 2019 Abstracts
          • photo gallery
      • DairyCare on JDR >
        • Copenhagen Programme
        • Copenhagen Abstracts
        • Cordoba Programme
        • Cordoba Abstracts
        • Zadar Programme
        • Zadar Abstracts
        • Lisbon Programme
        • Lisbon Abstracts
        • Thessaloniki Programme
        • Thessaloniki Abstracts
  • For authors
    • Prepare your Manuscript
    • Submit your Manuscript
    • Submit supplementary file
    • Submit your revision
    • Submit your Proof
    • Submit another type of article >
      • Research Reflections
      • Submit an invited article
      • Write to the Editor
      • Submit Foreign Language Abstract
      • Submit PhD Thesis Abstract
      • file upload
  • For reviewers
    • Peer Review Process
    • Peer Review: Paper
    • Peer Review: Research Communication
    • Peer Review: other types
    • Peer Review: Revised manuscript
    • Join the JDR Peer Review Pool
    • Guaranteed Reviewer status
  • Editorial Office
    • Survey
    • For EBM
  • Home
    • About >
      • Our JDR
      • Hannah Dairy Research Foundation
      • Log In assistance
      • Special Access pages
      • Data Privacy
    • Contact JDR
    • Join JDR Community
  • Latest Research
    • JDR Published Volumes >
      • JDR 90(1)
      • JDR 89(4)
      • JDR 89(3)
      • JDR 89(2)
      • JDR 89(1)
      • JDR 88(4)
      • JDR 88(3)
      • JDR 88(2)
      • JDR 88(1)
      • JDR 87(4)
      • JDR 87(3)
      • JDR 87(2)
      • JDR 87(1)
      • JDR 86(4)
      • JDR 86(3)
      • JDR 86(2)
      • JDR 86(1)
      • JDR 85(4)
      • JDR 85(3)
      • JDR 85(2)
      • Vol 85(1)
      • Vol 84(4)
      • JDR 84(3)
      • JDR 84(2)
      • JDR 84(1)
      • JDR 83(4)
      • JDR 83(3)
      • JDR 83(2)
      • JDR 83(1)
    • First View Articles
    • DairyCare Special Issue
    • Papers for Community Peer Review
    • Editorials
    • Reviews
    • Collected Abstracts
    • Foreign Language Abstracts
    • PhD Thesis Abstracts
    • Research clusters >
      • Wastewater cluster
      • Mastitis Cluster
    • Latest content infographic
    • Conferences and Workshops >
      • Next Generation Dairying >
        • Next Generation Dairying 2022 >
          • Workshop Expression of interest
          • Programme 2022
        • Next Generation Dairying 2021
        • Next Generation Dairying 2018 >
          • Workshop Proceedings
        • Next Generation Dairying 2019 >
          • Programme
          • 2019 Abstracts
          • photo gallery
      • DairyCare on JDR >
        • Copenhagen Programme
        • Copenhagen Abstracts
        • Cordoba Programme
        • Cordoba Abstracts
        • Zadar Programme
        • Zadar Abstracts
        • Lisbon Programme
        • Lisbon Abstracts
        • Thessaloniki Programme
        • Thessaloniki Abstracts
  • For authors
    • Prepare your Manuscript
    • Submit your Manuscript
    • Submit supplementary file
    • Submit your revision
    • Submit your Proof
    • Submit another type of article >
      • Research Reflections
      • Submit an invited article
      • Write to the Editor
      • Submit Foreign Language Abstract
      • Submit PhD Thesis Abstract
      • file upload
  • For reviewers
    • Peer Review Process
    • Peer Review: Paper
    • Peer Review: Research Communication
    • Peer Review: other types
    • Peer Review: Revised manuscript
    • Join the JDR Peer Review Pool
    • Guaranteed Reviewer status
  • Editorial Office
    • Survey
    • For EBM

Recommendation Assessment

    Recommendation Assessment


    Recommendation Assessment

    Guidance for Authors
    Max file size: 20MB

    Thank you, the Recommendation Assessment is complete. Remember to press SUBMIT!

Submit
New Hybrid Review Process information:
The Recommendation Assessment now includes an additional option:
  • Open manuscript to Community Peer Review
This is ONLY for manuscripts that do not have referee's reports after a suitable time, and you will be prompted to use this option in an email from the Editorial Office. You could alternatively elect to perform the full review yourself, and make a normal recommendation based on your own review.     

Thank you for guiding this manuscript through Peer Review. A Recommendation Assessment will be requested after the Referee's reports are received and again after Authors revisions are received (if required). The Assessments are based on those reports and revisions. Please conduct each Assessment as quickly as possible, preferably within one or two days from receipt.

A Recommendation Assessment will also be requested if a manuscript has not received Peer Review reports within a reasonable time frame.

The Recommendation Assessment decision has four main options: 
  • Return to Author for Revision based on referees comments
  • Return to Referees for review of the revisions
  • Recommend Acceptance
  • Recommend Rejection

In addition, you have the option to refer the manuscript to the Editor, and the Editorial Office may ask you to recommend opening the manuscript to Community Peer Review

If you choose to recommend Acceptance then you should also indicate if the manuscript has exceptional merit and is worthy of special promotion/marketing 

If you choose revision and wish to add your own suggestions for revision to those of the referees, you may do that in the guidance for authors box. You can upload your own file if you wish.  

​C
ompletion of Peer Review will often require two or three Recommendation assessments alternating between Authors and Referees (first two options). The final two options are only chosen when the manuscript is ready for a Final Decision from the Editor. 

Peer Review should be effective but also as rapid as possible. If the Authors revisions and explanations have clearly answered the Referee's criticisms effectively, the paper need not be returned to the Referee.     

Please always remember: Journal of Dairy Research is a high quality international journal, and only publishes good research. 





















Please remember to press the submit button when you have finished your Assessment. You will then see a "Thank you" screen. If you do not see this, the submission has failed, probably because you have not filled in all of the compulsory fields. Find the error and correct it, then press submit again. ​

What happens now? When you submit your assessment, the Editorial Office will perform the action that you  have recommended and will update the manuscript's webpage. 

       

Picture


JournalofDairyResearch.org is a Hannah Dairy Research Foundation website